case laws of cartels in pakistan - An Overview

five.  Acquired Deputy Prosecutor General as well as counsel for that complainant further argued that during the investigation in the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led into the recovery of sleeping pills on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has actually been generated before the Court wherein the sleeping tablets were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected inside the liver although not while in the belly. That's why, the recovery of mentioned sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Realized Deputy Prosecutor General together with counsel for that complainant have also argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Bhoora led to the recovery of a motorcycle.

When the punishment may be severe, its purpose will not be solely to seek vengeance but to prevent likely offenders and copyright the principles of justice and social order.

These lists are sorted chronologically by Chief Justice and consist of all notable cases decided from the court. Articles exist for almost all cases.

Deterrence: The anxiety of severe repercussions, such as capital punishment, is meant to prevent possible criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is crucial in reducing the prevalence of intentional killings.

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It is perfectly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within ninety times. If your appeal will not be decided within that timeframe, he/she will then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the ninety days to the department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided with the decision of the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.

This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the summary or finding achieved because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it acceptable for the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

only within the ground of miscases remanded & only around the ground of misreading of evidence only over the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

The issue here is that an accused might say that they meant to injure the target, but they did not plan to get rid of them. In other words, they may claim that thedeath that resulted as a result of accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.

This ruling has conditions, and since the petitioners failed a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 on the Constitution. Read more

The regulation of necessity acknowledged and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it had been the illegal action called regulation of necessity..

The DCFS social worker in charge with the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-thirty day period report into the court, the worker elaborated within the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury more info subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

A coalition of residents sent a letter of petition to your Supreme Court to challenge the Water and Power Progress Authority’s (WAPDA) construction of an electricity grid station in their community, on designated “green belt” property. The Court heard the matter for a human rights case, as Article 184 (3) from the Pakistan Constitution offers authentic jurisdiction towards the Supreme Court to take up and determine any matter concerning the enforcement of fundamental rights of public importance.

14. Within the light from the position explained higher than, it is actually concluded that a civil servant has a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be viewed as for no fault of his have and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency from the length of service or within the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *